Vehicle Owner

Member ID: scannon

Location: Erie, CO

Vehicle Info

1992 Mazda Miata

Bragging Rights

  • 1/4 Mile0 sec @ -1 mph
  • 0-600sec
  • Top Speed-1mph
  • HP-1
  • Weight-1lbs

Major Upgrades

  • turbo
  • nitrous
  • bore increase
  • port and polish
  • supercharger
  • extrude honed
  • stroke increase
  • engine swap

Ratings

    • Currently 2.9/5 Stars.
    • Currently 3.2/5 Stars.

Login to rate

 

Last updated: Sep 07, 2009

Hits: 36,175

Skip’s Mazda Miata

  • Currently 2.9076923076923 /5 Stars.
13 guestbook comments

February 3, 2006
Engine and Transmission Mounts

The engine and transmission mounts are now fabricated and installed in the car. Many thanks to John Grimberg, machinist extrodinare who came up with the idea for the transmission mount and designed and fabricated it and the engine mounts. The engine mounts are essentially identical to the Caterham SV mounts for the Focus engine, just sized a little larger and to fit the Miata engine.

scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata

Passenger side Driver side

scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata

The tailshaft housing on the right is the prototype butchered to fit with a sawzall, die grinder and file. The one on the left is a stock housing and the one in the middle is the machined piece.

scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata

Left is the machined piece that is bonded and bolted to the transmission after cutting away much of the original power plant frame mount. Right is another view from the rear.

scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata

The Caterham/Sierra T9 trans mount bolted to the intermediate piece and the tailshaft housing.

scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata

We made the motor mounts 1/4" taller than we measured, not knowing how much give there would be when the weight of the motor was finally allowed to rest on the mounts. The weight of the engine dropped the height 1/8" leaving clearance to the nose cone a little tight. I will shorten the outer ends of the engine mounts a bit to get a little more clearance.

scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata

The car is now on the floor with the engine and trans supported by the new mounts. Ground clearance under the oil pan came out at 4 1/4" but will lose 1/8 to 1/4" when I shorten the engine mounts. It looks like I may not have to shorten the oil pan after all although it would be easy to cut 1" out of the pan and extend the sump forward to make up for lost capacity. I am also considering an accusump to protect the engine under hard cornering loads.

scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata scannon's 1992 Mazda Miata

Views from the front of the car and looking down at the transmission as it disappears into the tunnel. The bosses on the sides of the transmission case had to be filed down to allow the trans to fit far enough into the tunnel.

A little more fit and finish work on the mounts and I can powder coat the engine mounts and get on with the plumbing and wiring. A major milestone has been achieved!

Feburary 4, 2006

I removed the engine mounts and using a belt sander, removed 1/8" off the bottom of the outer end of the mounts. I also removed the rear vacuum fitting and now everything fits fine and I have 4 1/8" clearance under the oil sump. I am leaning towards modifying the pan anyway, 5+ inches of clearance sounds good to me even though my lowered Miata has less. The Miata pan is somewhat protected by the subframe, the Caterham pan is hanging out the all by itself.

The start of this project is here

Guestbook

Displaying entries 1-5 of 13

lugnut  

Posted by: lugnut

03/02/2009 04:48PM

Great looking ride.

p1re9lu9de2  

Posted by: p1re9lu9de2

08/20/2007 03:09PM

looks great!!! 5 stars.... come check me out sometime

p1re9lu9de2  

Posted by: p1re9lu9de2

08/20/2007 03:09PM

looks great!!! 5 stars.... come check me out sometime

HondaWonderBoy  

Posted by: HondaWonderBoy

12/25/2006 10:19AM

Wow clean motor work my man! Keep up the great work, there's nothing like a fun lil rwd roadster! Check out my turbocharged accord sometime!

dale8888  

Posted by: dale8888

12/13/2006 04:27PM

Cheers for that. That is a pretty decent sized turbo! I was thinking of a 28 series BB turbo. I was hoping for 200rwkw out of the 1.6L, but I don't think that is going to happen reliably. So I will probably either stroke it, or get a blown 1.8L and rebuild that with a stroker kit. In which case I would probably go with a 30 series BB turbo. Cheers for the info.
Just to let you know I'm from Australia, across the other side of the world :D Thanks for the website too.

Cheers,

Kendall

Show Older Comments

Post a comment

Bookmark this Ride

Vehicle Owner

Member ID: scannon

Location: Erie, CO